RU486
Last week the Food and Drug
Administration approved an important new drug for use in the U.S. You may be
wondering, "just what is this RU486?"
RU486 is an anti-progesterone drug,
in the same way that tamoxifen is an anti-estrogen substance. Both work by attaching to the cells'
receptors for the specific hormone and thus interfering with that hormone's
action. Many people know someone who has used tamoxifen after surgery for
breast cancer of the type that is stimulated by estrogen.
Progesterone is a female sex
hormone that is produced by the empty ovarian follicle after ovulation in the
second half of the normal menstrual cycle. As its name implies, it is
"pro"-gestational, that is it stimulates the growth of the uterine
lining for the attachment of the ovum. If the ovum is not fertilized or not
attached, it is shed along with the extra uterine lining, producing a normal
menstrual period. However, if implantation of the fertilized ovum does occur,
the progesterone production increases and is later taken over by the placenta.
RU486 was developed by a French
physician-biochemist, Etienne-Emile Baulieu, who had been studying steroid
hormones and their receptors, particularly the progesterone receptor, seeking
new approaches to fertility control. The goal was to find a compound similar
enough to progesterone to bind to its receptor, but different enough that it
would have anti-progesterone activity. Drug development is a team effort, and
early in the process the chemists at the drug company Roussel were involved.
Many years and many tests later the compound RU486 was ready for testing in
animals, and finally in the l980's in humans. It proved to be remarkably
effective and safe
The drug was first licensed in
France in 1989, and since then it has provided early and safe abortions in many
women. However, there are other potential uses as well. Some breast cancers that have become
resistant to anti-estrogen treatment may respond with the addition of an
anti-progesterone agent. Interestingly, meningioma a type of brain tumor, has
progesterone receptors and may shrink with the use of this drug.
Anti-progesterone compounds may also have a future as contraceptive agents with
fewer side effects than the estrogen containing birth-control pills.
Although this non-surgical method
of pregnancy termination is indeed safe and effective, it still requires
medical supervision. However, resort to surgery is rarely required, so it is
a boon to the less-developed countries where the alternative might be dangerous
and unskilled back street abortion.
Whatever the final role of RU486,
the recent FDA approval opens the door to productive study and research on its
actions and usage.
Mary Frantz, MD
October 2, 2000